Martin, Thank you for the testing and information.
We're just starting to use SQLite and are using SQLite.NET. This library doesn't support connection pooling and we've been discussing whether to implement connection pooling external to the library. Your post certainly makes it look worthwhile. When I have time to run some tests using our actual schema (120+ tables, several hundred indexes) I'll post back here in case others are interested in our results. From your tests it looks like more complex schemas probably take more time to parse (as would be expected) so a real-world schema might take longer than a test schema. Best regards, Sam ------------------------------------------- We're Hiring! Seeking a passionate developer to join our team building Flex based products. Position is in the Washington D.C. metro area. If interested contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Martin Jenkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 10:58 AM To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org Subject: Re: [sqlite] How fast is the sqlite connection created? Martin Jenkins wrote: > So the difference in connect times between a database with 1 table and > 10 tables is ... It appears that adding indexes (and triggers?) increases the time at about the same rate as adding tables. That is a connect/first select to a database with 1 table and 3 indexes takes about as long it does to a database with 4 tables. Martin ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
