As you suspect, it is straightforward to make a Fortran to SQLite binding. Here's an example with Fortran 77: http://danial.org/sqlite/fortran/ I don't see why an F95 binding would need to be compiler specific. -- Al
On 4/14/07, Gary Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, this is my first post, so please excuse any etiquette goofs. I'm researching incorporation of SQLite into a project. It would appear relatively straightforward to develop an F95 language binding, however it is likely to be compiler specific (extensions required to adapt calling syntax to C). Is this a suitable place to ask basic C-oriented questions relative to the existing API? Also, it would be my desire to not only map the existing API exactly (as public), but to also create a small additional layer atop the existing API with a slightly higher abstraction level to hide some of the low levelness of the API (pointers, handle passing, etc.). Would anybody be interested in helping or critiquing as I progress? (I haven't decided to do this yet, I'm awaiting corporate approval to use public domain software in my project, which they have refused in the past. This part of the project would be on my own time so as to not involve company ownership issues). -- Gary Scott mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] dot net Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org -OR- Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows it can't be done. -- Henry Ford ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
