Heh, no, I've never tried, but I don't see much reason why I couldn't. I was just trying to make the point that labeling SQLite as "good ... for smaller databases" was not a slight.
-T > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:51 AM > To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org > Subject: RE: [sqlite] SQLite and Columnar Databases > > --- Tom Briggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For clarity, my definition of small is about 200GB, so I'm not > > selling SQLite short here... > > Are you able to get decent performance out of sqlite3 for a > 200GB database? > > How much RAM do you have on such a machine? > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > ______________________ > Looking for last minute shopping deals? > Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. > http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------- > To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------- > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
