--- "D. Richard Hipp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion.
No problem.
For what it's worth, I am also curious as to the final form of the
VM opcode transformation. The number of opcodes generated by the various
SQL statements seems to be roughly the same as the old scheme. At this
point without sub-expresssion elimination are you seeing any speed
improvement?
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
