Iker Arizmendi wrote: > A single server process can be used to track "global" information, but > shared memory mapped by unrelated processes might do as well. For > example, a common mmap'ed file might serve to track lock info for > each process. > Of course, such a scheme would have to support handling of crashed > processes without burdening the common case. But assuming it did, is > this the main obstacle?
A better question may be - what's the benefit? What's the point of the exercise? What's the advantage over the traditional server architecture? Igor Tandetnik _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
