On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Dan Kennedy <danielk1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:48 AM, P Kishor wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Roger Binns >> <rog...@rogerbinns.com> wrote: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> sub sk79 wrote: >>>> How So? Is SQLite getting a high concurrency module from BDB in >>>> exchange for its SQL API? >>> >>> I believe the btree/paging layer is replaced with BDB. >>> >> >> >> How does BDB's (or any code from Oracle) inclusion into the SQLite >> source tree affect the public domain nature of SQLite? To the extent >> that there is any code from Oracle, has that been dedicated to public >> domain as well? Am very curious about clarity on this. >> >> Also, from which version on has Oracle code entered the SQLite tree? > > No Oracle code has been added to the SQLite tree. SQLite licensing > remains unchanged. >
thanks for the clarification, but how does the above statement reconcile with "the btree/paging layer is replaced with BDB"? Does that refer to a different version of SQLite being offered by Oracle that includes BDB for storage? I hope that will be called something else... mebbe sqlbdb? -- Puneet Kishor http://www.punkish.org Carbon Model http://carbonmodel.org Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org Science Commons Fellow, http://sciencecommons.org/about/whoweare/kishor Nelson Institute, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
