Hello! On Monday 29 March 2010 20:22:36 D. Richard Hipp wrote: > SQLite version 1 used gdbm for storage. There were many problems with > that approach: (1) gdbm is a hash-based system so it could not do > range queries (2) gdbm is GPL, (3) Each table and index is in a > separate file so your "database" was a directory full of files instead > of a single file, (4) there is no support for transactions, (5) gdbm > is highly vulnerable to corruption if a power loss occurs while it is > being updated.
May be the Tokyo Cabinet DBMS is more better? BerkeleyDB is required administration and it's strange solution in many embedded devices and for some desktops and servers too. Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov. http://pechnikov.tel/ _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
