On 6 Jun 2011, at 1:49pm, Igor Tandetnik wrote: > Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: >> > >> http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~shadow/sql/sql1992.txt > > If we talking about the standard, note that both division by zero and numeric > overflow are supposed to trigger an error: > > 6.12-General Rules-4: If the value of a divisor is zero, then an exception > condition is raised: data exception-division by zero. [snip] > > > So SQLite behaves neither in the way expected by the OP, nor in the way > prescribed by the standard (I'm not arguing that's a bad thing, just stating > the fact).
Ah. In that case, I /would/ argue that this is bad, and that SQLite should conform to the standard. Whenever someone can get around to it. Simon. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users