On Sep 17, 2011, at 8:43 PM, Mr. Puneet Kishor wrote: > All this chattering among us doesn't really matter (other than for academic > purposes).
For the, hmmm, more scholarly inclined on the list, a marginally more readable ISO spec, ISO/IEC 9075-2:2003: http://synthesis.ipi.ac.ru/synthesis/student/oodb/essayRef/sqlFoundation > All that matters is whether or not Richard and co. deem it worth including as > a capability in factory provided SQLite. While I can't attest to it, there > are probably instances where SQLite deviates from the so called standard > ("the problem with standards is there are plenty of them" and all that). For > me, if Pg does it, the SQLite could do it if those who make SQLite could be > convinced of its usefulness. > > For me, I don't care either way. I am glad Pg has it because I am trying to > convert MySQL data to Pg. While I am failing to do so painlessly for the most > part, a few of the (simpler) tables convert fine because both MySQL and Pg > support multi-line INSERTs. FWIW, I personally find that specific flavor of multi-rows INSERT rather esoteric and borderline useless, but each to their own. I would not mind seeing MERGE tough :)) _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
