At 01:08 17/01/2012, you wrote: ´¯¯¯
Richard, Simon, and you are seeing eye-to-eye on this. Earlier in the thread (since trimmed, of course), it was stated that SQLite was designed to be tiny so that each app could include the entire system without draining resources significantly (this would solve the problem of apps stepping on each other with different versions of <sqlite3.dll>). So if that's the case, why not kill the distribution of <sqlite3.dll> and force the developers to do it the right way? Regards, Joe
`---
That would preclude use of SQLite in situation where no linking is possible, like many scripting languages, etc. That it is allright for your current use cases doesn't imply it's convenient or even possible for others.
_______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
