It would seem to me that if GC.Collect fixes the problem than all you've done 
is move the problem to someplace else that isn't fatal (at the moment) and 
could rear its ugly head at most any time.

The reason your emulator doesn't throw the error would be for the same 
reason...different memory allocation strategies.

When you run GC.Collect you're going to reclaim lots of small memory blocks 
which will separate the locations more.  Without GC.Collect you're probably 
getting sequential memory blocks which show up as access violations due to 
adjacent memory abuse.  You're just lucky you see the error at all.

I believe you have a buffer overwrite occurring somewhere.

Have you tried the run-time checks to see it they can help pinpoint it?
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa290051.aspx#vctchcompilersecuritychecksindepthanchor4


Michael D. Black
Senior Scientist
Advanced Analytics Directorate
Advanced GEOINT Solutions Operating Unit
Northrop Grumman Information Systems

________________________________________
From: sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org [sqlite-users-boun...@sqlite.org] on 
behalf of Matthew Dumbleton [msd...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 5:46 AM
To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
Subject: EXT :Re: [sqlite] Seemingly random Access Violation errors

Joe,

I'm afraid this doesn't seem to fix the issue.
Just out of interest are you able to run the code I sent on a real device or in 
an emulator? I'm testing on a Motorola ES400 and didn't initially think to try 
switching to the emulator which doesn't seem to throw the error (still testing 
though.)
Don't know if it's relevant but I seem to 'fix' the issue if I call a 
GC.Collect before every connection to the database.  But of course this could 
just be because it runs slower when doing this and in any case probably not 
good practice.
Will continue to test.

> From: sql...@mistachkin.com
> To: sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 17:20:18 -0700
> Subject: Re: [sqlite] Seemingly random Access Violation errors
>
>
> Matthew Dumbleton wrote:
> >
> > I have tried this change and I'm afraid it hasn't stopped the crashes.
> >
>
> I've further refined the locking semantics for the .NET Compact Framework
> build here:
>
>       https://system.data.sqlite.org/index.html/info/ac5f4cc084
>
> I think this should correct the problem, although I'm not actually able to
> reproduce
> the problem here.
>
> --
> Joe Mistachkin
>
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@sqlite.org
> http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users


_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to