On Thu 2012-10-25 14:29:48, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:03:13AM -0700, da...@lang.hm wrote:
> > I agree, this is why I'm trying to figure out the recommended way to
> > do this without needing to do full commits.
> >
> > Since in most cases it's acceptable to loose the last few chunks
> > written, if we had some way of specifying ordering, without having
> > to specify "write this NOW", the solution would be pretty obvious.
>
> Well, using data journalling with ext3/4 may do what you want. If you
> don't do any fsync, the changes will get written every 5 seconds when
> the automatic journal sync happens (and sub-4k writes will also get
Hmm. But that would need setting journalling mode per-file, no?
Like, make it journal data for all the databases, but keep normal mode
for rest of system...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@sqlite.org
http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
