On Mon, 2013-04-08 at 09:31 +0200, Kees Nuyt wrote: > On Mon, 08 Apr 2013 08:39:49 +0200, Alexandr N?mec <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > thanks for your replies, but unfortunately they did not answer > > my original question whether these warnings are harmless and > > can be ignored or not. These warnings reported by the VS C++ > > compiler are about "possible loss of data", so it is a > > situation when a "int64" expression result is assigned to an > > "int" variable for example. In such cases these warnings are > > very legitimate. If such an assignment is the real intention > > of the programmer, an explicit (int) typecast should be added, > > because it will > > > >- tell to the rest of the world, that the programmer knows > > what he is doing, ie. he really wants to "truncate" the result, > > The programmers know what they are doing. > As <http://www.sqlite.org/faq.html#q17> tells, they are harmless if all > tests scripts succeed. The test scripts are run before every SQLite > release. SQLite is not released if a test fails. So, the warnings can be > ignored. >
Or, it could be the tests simply don't exercise those possibilities. I've been in IT far too long to trust that a test suite is "complete". -- Roland Hughes, President Logikal Solutions (630)-205-1593 http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com http://www.infiniteexposure.net No U.S. troops have ever lost their lives defending our ethanol reserves. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list [email protected] http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
