Yes, thanks. I was mistaken. On Sep 6, 2013, at 9:27 PM, "James K. Lowden" <jklow...@schemamania.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Sep 2013 07:56:53 -0500 > "Marc L. Allen" <mlal...@outsitenetworks.com> wrote: > >> I don't think it's a bug. > > It is a bug as long as the behavior is in exception to the > documentation. > >> I don't believe there's any defined rule for how SQL should behave, >> is there? > > Of course there is. Hundreds of pages describe SQL. > >> The updates are done serially not atomically. > > They're not *supposed* to be. Updates are absolutely atomic. Every > SQL statement is atomic. > > --jkl > > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users This email and any attachments are only for use by the intended recipient(s) and may contain legally privileged, confidential, proprietary or otherwise private information. Any unauthorized use, reproduction, dissemination, distribution or other disclosure of the contents of this e-mail or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
