On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Andres Riancho <andres.rian...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Roger Binns <rog...@rogerbinns.com> wrote: > > > > It sounds like what you could use temporary tables and let SQLite do the > > work for you. > > > Hmmm. How about this. Stop turning synchronous off for a month or two > and see if people stop reporting the fault. > > Yep, that's a great idea. > > FWIW, temporary tables *always* operate as if synchronous=off, regardless of the actually synchronous setting.... -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
