For your second point, SQLite4 "may" never be released, or if it is going to be, not for a few years yet. 4 is a toy for the devs to try things out without borking things up in 3. 3 is being used by millions (or is it billions?) of devices and applications that the dev team is (very right) in not tinkering with as it could break a LOT of applications.
I had already poked the team about the life expectancy of 3 and meat and potatoes of the conversation was that due to 3 being used in so many known, and unknown places that its expiry isn't going to be for a long while yet. On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 4:47 AM, big stone <stonebi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > To prepare for end of 2014 greetings moment, here is my whish list for > 2015: > - a minimal subset of analytic functions [1], that I hope may help > end-user/students popularity [2] > - better information on what is coming ahead, for example: > . I see the 'sessions' tree moving along main tree since a few months, > what is it about ? > . sqlite4 is dead because sqlite3 did progress quicker than expected ? > . .... > > [1] http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/tutorial-window.html > > [2] http://db-engines.com/en/ranking_trend > > Regards, > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
