I'm a big time die hard fan of "text only".  I'm an information consumer,
and not someone who likes being distracted by meaningless visual effects.

My Linux consoles are all (mostly) white on black, my 5-monitor Windows
desktop looks like Windows 2000, and my 3-monitor work machine follows that
suit.  Both machines are setup with a solid candy apple red background and
not that dark or light blue.  No pictures, no fancy graphics.  Performance
gains alone for just that (My machine isn't a slouch, and is still in the
top 10% for 3DMark benchmarks even at 3 years old).  I tell Windows to not
animate windows on min/max/restore.  I tell Windows to not animate the drop
down boxes, or scroll boxes.  If I were to run a Linux desktop (And I have
in the past) I turned those fancy eye candy functions off as well.

Any forum I do go to (Which is only a few, and rarely viewed) I actively go
in and remove the icons, tag lines, footers, change the UI to something
basic, and easy to read.  I don't care to see what peoples icons are, I
don't care what they're taglines say, I don't care about anything other
than who posted, and what they had to say.

I find it hilarious that we're moving on to 4k displays on the desktop and
TVs, yet, icons keep getting bigger and bigger, requiring more horsepower
from GPUs and CPUs to render, and more desktop real estate used to
accommodate those larger icons.  Even icons on my freak'n phone are getting
bigger, to no advantage.

I'm a die hard fan of simplicity, nothing over complex, easy to digest, and
love reducing the "eye candy" that has absolutely no relation to what I'm
interested in.

When we're in an age where monitors on our desktops are now typically wide
screen, when a websites design FORCES a portrait view of their content
annoys me to no end.  ESPECIALLY when their advertisements take away from
the content I want to read because that ad wants to take over the 800 pixel
wide column of text, while the other 1120 pixels go to digital waste.

Forum software is often very misused.  They're used as trackers, they're
used for notifying of versions of new software, they're used for bug
reports.  They're used quite often for stuff that ISN'T a conversation.
Maintenance of that software also becomes an issue, in that updates have to
happen, someone has to manage the software as moderators, clean up crap
posts, get rid of spammers, so on and so on.

They're a common attack vector for spammers, hackers, and all that.  I
don't have to worry about someone finding an exploit to the latest flavor
of BLOG forum software, and then getting access to a database that contains
information that I'm forced to enter that I didn't want to enter at
registration.


On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Paul Sanderson <
sandersonforens...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Theres another reason - consistency.
>
> Just look back thorugh this thread and see how things are quoted,
> often differently depending on the mail client used - much easier to
> read when a quote is nicely formatted in a highlighted box.
>
> Then (just from this thread)  there is formatting of dates - all
> different and with differing timezones, depending on the users
> settings. Trivial but forum software takes care of all of this for
> you.
>
> Tends to be die hard linux users who like mail lists (and text only
> email) and the rest of us have moved on :)
> Paul
> www.sandersonforensics.com
> skype: r3scue193
> twitter: @sandersonforens
> Tel +44 (0)1326 572786
> http://sandersonforensics.com/forum/content.php?195-SQLite-Forensic-Toolkit
> -Forensic
> <http://sandersonforensics.com/forum/content.php?195-SQLite-Forensic-Toolkit-Forensic>
> Toolkit for SQLite
> email from a work address for a fully functional demo licence
>
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to