Pardon me, but: At what point does the code required for the inclusion of a multitude of supported data formats exceed the core purpose of the executable?
At some point, obtaining a desired output format (from the potentially dozens available) might be offloaded to a different executable that performs that function, rather than bloating program X with a thousand input/output formats. This is an unsolicited opinion. The decision rests with the good Dr. Hipp, who selflessly volunteers his time and skills. Keith On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Dominique Devienne <ddevienne at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, Richard Hipp <drh at sqlite.org> wrote: > >> Your feedback is encouraged. >> > > https://www.sqlite.org/draft/c3ref/value_subtype.html does not say what > happens or which value we get, > should one call sqlite3_value_subtype on a sqlite_value* which which > no sqlite3_result_subtype() > was made. > > Can we have some guarantee, like always 0, or MAX_INT, or something? > Thanks, --DD > > PS: Thanks for this json1 experimental extension! > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users at mailinglists.sqlite.org > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
