Umm, At 05:16 03/09/2009, you wrote: ´¯¯¯ >Thanks for reminding me: A thing's value is generally proportional to >its cost. And the attitude of its support team figures in there, too. >-R. > > >> Whether _you_ consider them problems or not, they were certainly > >> problems for me, migrating a working application to version 3 and > having > >> it fall over in subtle ways because of these undocumented two vs three > >> differences. They cost me several hours of unnecessary analysis time. > >> > > > > You should bill DRH for this. Or, ask for your money back. Seriously, > > esp. since the product is still under warranty. `---
What a wonderful example of arrogant attitude! What a brilliant understanding you demonstrate of what "open (and _free_) software" means! DRH, other developpers and hundreds of contributors really should have frozen SQLite design from the day You Mighty wrote the first line of Your Mighty code, just to avoid You Mighty the horrible frustration of having to change Your Mighty code at all. And this of course until the sun goes nova: think of Your Mighty descendants! What have you contributed so far to allow yourself such superior position? Have you ever shown the faintest step of commitment that so many here constantly bring to SQLite, openly or silently? Are you the author of one definitive "Guide for migrating SQLite v2x to v3x applications" that will be available in the Wiki for anyone to benefit? Have you made any proposal to improve existing documentation or code? Please, make us the favor to switch to Oracle or any other utterly expensive RDBMS and go whine elsewhere for lack of support/reactivity (esp. Oracle). _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
