Why you need ICU library to parse datetime strings?!! The my previous patch to parse Russian dates has only single row without any external libs.
2012/4/2 Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote: > > > > > I think ... a higher priority than that would be handling Unicode > > correctly. And having Unicode support would be useful in writing the > code > > which handles dates. > > > > > size of SQLite library: approx 500 KB > size of ICU library: approx 21,919 KB > > The ICU library (needed to handle Unicode "correctly") is over 40x larger > than SQLite. Can you understand then why we don't want to make SQLite > dependent upon ICU? > > If you really need correct ICU support, SQLite will optionally link with > ICU and use it. But *requiring* SQLite to link against ICU is a > deal-breaker for many users. > > -- > D. Richard Hipp > d...@sqlite.org > _______________________________________________ > sqlite-users mailing list > sqlite-users@sqlite.org > http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users > -- Best regards, Alexey Pechnikov. http://pechnikov.tel/ _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
