John Locke said:
> Rick Castello said:
>> William E. Kempf said:
>>> Here's two features I'd like, and I was wondering if there were any
>>> plugins that currently do this.
>>>
>>> 1) Ability to mark all the messages in a folder as read. A bit
>>> unusual, but I have a backup folder that often gets VERY large.
>>> Marking messages as read page by page is tedious, while doing a show
>>> all can actually time out (and even if I increased the time out, the
>>> length of time required to do this is unreasonable). So I'd like
>>> some method for just marking all messages in the folder as read.
>>
> Ah, but William stated above that Show All timed out ...
>
> I think the real issue here is not Squirrelmail, but your IMAP server.
> Let me guess... you're using UW-IMAP.
>
> I was having similar trouble with some of my folders. Switched to
> Courier-IMAP, and moved everything to Maildirs, and now it's speedy, and
> Rick's method works fine.
Whoops... I missed that. You're right. Either speed up the
IMAP server, or handle mail more quickly. :)
>>> 2) A way to quickly move messages to a Spam folder (probably user
>>> configurable).
>>> Any luck with either of these?
>>
>> This seems a bit much to me... if you're really having a
>> difficult
>> time scrolling down to the Spam folder, rename the Spam folder
>> something that will assure that it appears right below your default
>> folders. Experiment with symbols allowed by your IMAP server.
>> Prepend your most used folders with symbols that will assure their
>> place at the top of the list.
>>
>> Our real estate for buttons is pretty crowded already, and until
>> or
>> unless we write a spam-predicting plugin like what you're using to the
>> core, it seems excessive to add a "Mark as Spam" feature.
>>
> Well, I'm not going to be quite as discouraging as Rick, but I am going
> to say... have at it! It's going to take some coding, and nobody knows
> your needs quite as well as you.
*grin* Sure. Everyone's always welcome to tweak things however
they like. Open source is good like that, and I didn't think it
required saying. :)
My answer comes purely from a project lead standpoint, dealing
with the core. So let me rephrase: if you want to patch your
install or write a plugin to do this, great. However, it deals
only with spam filtering usage, and since the core doesn't yet
have spam code, this shouldn't go there yet either.
Better? ;)
-Rick
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community
Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
