> We do not want to use NFS for saving session data and there is anything
> better than a database to keep data consistent.

NFS should be fine with persistence, GFS should be fine all around, as long as 
PHP
uses something that's NFS-safe for locking the files.  For that matter though, 
if
its locking isn't filesystem-based at all, even GFS won't solve the problem.

> Another reason is that we want full/instantaneous automatic feilover. If
> we use persistence with a 15-second timeout, many users will get
> problems if the server they are using stops working.

Doesn't LVS handle this automagically anyway?

John




-- 
John Madden
UNIX Systems Engineer
Ivy Tech State College
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
Click here to start!  http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id5hix
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines: 
http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: [email protected]
List Archives: 
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id)95
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to