>
> > No, why? Since I've moved sessions to an NFS shared point that
> > should be fine. No?
>
> You WILL get goofy behaviour with this due to NFS's lack of flock() support.
>
> SQM will work, but strange things will happen (messages being deleted from
> the wrong folder, for example) when sessions start getting clobbered. At
> the very least, establish persistence to your web servers on your load
> balancer so the one-web-server-at-a-time can serialize requests to the
> PHP session as the user makes simultaneous requests.
>
I guess I could do that. I did have problems with session issues
until I turned on statd/lockd on all machines involved.
>
> If you go to storing the sessions in the database, I don't know if load
> balancing will work at all without modifications being made to SQM
> (i.e., adding explicit row locks at appropriate places).
>
Why would the database see it as any different from a single
server?
Thanks, Tuc
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tell us your software development plans!
Take this survey and enter to win a one-year sub to SourceForge.net
Plus IDC's 2005 look-ahead and a copy of this survey
Click here to start! http://www.idcswdc.com/cgi-bin/survey?id=105hix
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
Posting Guidelines:
http://squirrelmail.org/wiki/wiki.php?MailingListPostingGuidelines
List Address: [email protected]
List Archives:
http://news.gmane.org/thread.php?group=gmane.mail.squirrelmail.user
List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
