Not really a great answer for you, but I think you should reconsider using `topos` to reduce SIP message size.
`topos` is complex and I'm not sure the added complexity pays off in this case, from a purely thermodynamic point of view. > On 26 Feb 2024, at 06:11, Benoit Panizzon via sr-users > <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org> wrote: > > Hi > > I'm having another go at topos trying to solve an issue of sip messages > getting to big for certain clients to process. > > Unfortunately some methods (ACK/PRACK/BYE probably CANCEL) do not > contain a contact header, therefore the topology is still revealed (and > potentially a lot of via header inserted increasing message size). > > Is it safe to set methods_nocontact to an empty string to force > creation of a Contact header for every SIP method? > > Is there another way to completely hide topology aka keeping header > small? > > Mit freundlichen Grüssen > > -Benoît Panizzon- > -- > I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden > ______________________________________________________ > > Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00 > CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01 > Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch > ______________________________________________________ > __________________________________________________________ > Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions > To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org > Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the > sender! > Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe: -- Alex Balashov Principal Consultant Evariste Systems LLC Web: https://evaristesys.com Tel: +1-706-510-6800 __________________________________________________________ Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions To unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-le...@lists.kamailio.org Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender! Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
