On 5/13/13 4:47 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 05/13/2013 10:45 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
append_branch() is not needed anymore (for couple of releases, actually,
being added in one of the 3.x releases), but should be harmless unless
you do other changes of r-uri/dst-uri after append_branch(). Can you try
without append branch?
Oh. Well, that was news to me. I guess I missed this. So, now when
t_relay() is called from failure route it automatically appends a new
branch as necessary?
Yes, if the r-uri is changed in failure route, a new branch is created
by t_relay() without need of using explicitly append_branch().
But again, using append_branch() once before t_relay() there should do
nothing (backward compatible behavior). Unless some new code changed
that behavior -- iirc, append_branch() was affected by some outbound code.
Cheers,
Daniel
Given this knowledge, I find it likely that branches are being
automatically appended by the proxy and then additionally appended
manually. I'll look into it from this angle. Thank you!
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24-27, 2013
* http://asipto.com/u/katu *
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
