On 10 Dec 2022, at 21:56, Lassi Kortela <la...@lassi.io> wrote: > It's confusing if an SRFI exports identifiers that are not defined in the > text of some other SRFI. > > I sympathize with the desire to have more convenient libraries to import, > instead of importing a whole bundle of SRFIs. But this is IMHO a misuse of > the SRFI process. This is yet another problem that comes back to the basic > fact that SRFI is not good at addressing evolving needs.
I strongly disagree and would like to politely request that you not use the mailing list for this SRFI to discuss your views on the issue of the SRFI process in general. Daphne
