On 10 Dec 2022, at 22:46, Lassi Kortela <la...@lassi.io> wrote: >> I strongly disagree and would like to politely request that you not use the >> mailing list for this SRFI to discuss your views on the issue of the SRFI >> process in general. > > I'm afraid I don't respect your sentiment. I've spared no effort to help the > process and the result is incomprehension and disdain. Wrong list; wrong > tone; who invited you here; we like our stuff the way it is; etc. > > Anyone else who's come along, and who will come along in the future to raise > similar concerns will receive a similar response. That's the real problem. > When it comes to big picture thinking, all this community can muster is to > shoot the messenger.
I am the author of this SRFI and would prefer that the mailing list for this SRFI remain on-topic: discussing matters specifically related to this SRFI. I’m well aware of the objections you’ve made elsewhere. I don’t agree with them, but I also don’t object to you discussing them in forums such as scheme-reports-wg2 and srfi-discuss where more general procedural questions are more relevant. Please keep this list on topic. Daphne
