> > there is no reason to continue to run the SSH1 implementations.
That is not really true. The SSH1 implementation has a much more
reasonable liscense agreement, and is in wide use for internal
maintenance in the commercial environment. Something that you can not
do with SSH2 without spending big $$. I for one will continue to use
ssh1 indefinetly because of that.
>
> Aside from the fact that patches exist for ssh1 to work with certain
> environments (such as AFS; possibly others, can't think of any) that
> do not exist for ssh2 yet, and as far as I have heard from the
> developers, aren't even in the works.
>
> So maybe it should have this pointed out in the FAQ.
>
> --
> Atro Tossavainen (Mr.), Systems Analyst - email at URL -
> +358-9-850-111-86 Institute of Biotechnology, University of
> Helsinki, Finland My opinions may freely be shared by my employers
> if they want to.
>
> < URL : http : / / www . iki . fi / atro . tossavainen / >
>
