On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 03:37:58PM +0300, Atro Tossavainen wrote:
> > - More information on SSH1 v. SSH2 (section 1.12, you know, the debated
> > section)
> Even though it is Tatu's official party line that there is no reason to
> use ssh1 any more, I would really prefer to see the obvious pointed out
> in the FAQ.
If you look at section 1.12, I did edit it. I did include reasons why and
why not. Please reread this section before saying that I didn't change it.
> Seeing as it already is hosted by sites who aren't affiliated with the
> business, I see few political reasons not to, aside from an employee
> acting as the editor.
I really find that offensive, given that I've been following the mailing
list, and I have incorporated quite a bit of information in there.
Please reload your page before flaming me next time. Also, please note that
I do the FAQ and I do what I can to include EVERYONE (I've put up more
information about OpenSSH especially), and that I do not do this as a
representative of SSH, but of myself.
-Anne
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anne Carasik | Economists state their GNP growth
Principal Consultant | projections to the nearest tenth of
SSH Communications Security, Inc. | a percentage point to prove they have
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | a sense of humor. -Edgar R. Fiedler
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unless stated otherwise above, the opinions expressed herein are my own,
not of my employer.
