Despite these impressive figures, my stainless steel rail (AristoCraft) has
run electric trains far more reliably than the brass rail I have always
previously used. Cleaned with LGB rail cleaning engine twice in three years.
Brass rail required a track cleaning run every time I wished to operate.

Gary - chilling in Eugene, Oregon
http://www.angelfire.com/or/trainguy
http://community.webshots.com/user/raltzenthor

----- Original Message -----
From: steve boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of sslivesteam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 5:39 AM
Subject: Re: Track Help for Ferdinand


> Trot the Fox contributed:
>
> > It's either Copper or Gold, I'm not sure which is absolute best.  I
believe
> > it's Copper.  Copper is used in most wiring for good reason
> > though.  :)  Chip-makers are now converting over to Copper conductors
> > inside the chips to improve speed and lower temps/power consumption over
> > the Aluminum they had been using previously.  :)
> >
> > Trot, the semiconductor-working, fox...
>
> The top conductivity is silver.  Unfortunately, silver rail tends to
> oxidize quickly, and is hard to keep clean.  It's also much more expensive
> than the more commonly-used materials.  :-)
>
> For reference, here's a copy of a list of standard conductivities,
> referenced to annealed copper:
>
> Silver 106%
> Copper 100%
> Gold 65%
> Aluminum (alloys) 50%
> Brass 28%
> Steel   3-15%
> Nickle-silver   5%
>
> In choosing a metal for trackwork, simple conductivity is not the only
> consideration.  You also need to balance corrosion, surface oxidation,
> mechanical strength, and cost.  All the usual engineering tradeoffs.
>
> (One might ask "So why is so much gold used in semiconductor
> manufacturing?"  Two good reasons:  it doesn't corrode or oxidize, so it
> makes a great conductive or protective plating.  The other reason is that
> it's highly ductile:  gold can easily be drawn into very fine wire which
> is used to connect the lead frames to the chips.  Or at least it was last
> time I took a few chips apart, which is now, um, some time ago!)
>
> - - Steve, feeling pedantic
> this morning.
>
 

Reply via email to