On 12 July 2011 11:29, Bertrand Delacretaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Enrico, > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Enrico Daga <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 12 July 2011 10:37, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ...The requirement that all dependencies must be in central isn't apache >>> specific, any artifact in central must satisfy this requirement (maven >>> central is self-contained). > >> Does it mean we cannot have embedded local repositories? >> Actually this is the only way to include some libraries such owlapi >> (recently with apache compatible license), which is mandatory for all >> ontology-based modules. I knew release on maven central to be in plan, >> but I don't know the status about it.... > > I think having an embedded local repository is fine as a temporary fix. > > Do we have a JIRA issue that reminds us to fix this once the owlapi > situation is clearer? Opened right now: STANBOL-265 and STANBOL-266 (I have divided the issues because they affect different modules) > >> >> Another aspect is related to LGPL dependencies. If I am not wrong we >> cannot include lgpl dependencies even in incubator/alpha releases, >> right? >> If this is the case we must support Jena as default reasoner asap if >> we want to deliver the reasoners module (I would like it to happen).... > > According to http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html LGPL dependencies > cannot be included. > > Unless this can be fixed quickly, we could make a first release > without the parts that have LGPL dependencies. Don't know if STANBOL-185 (Jena reasoner as default) will be fixed in time for the release, even if I would like to.
Enrico > > -Bertrand > -- Enrico Daga -- http://www.enridaga.net skype: enri-pan
