Hi,

On Thursday August 9 2007, Sergei Golovan wrote:
> 3) (Theoretical question) If we look at client capabilities XEP (115)
> we may see that it reaches it's purpose if a features list isn't
> changed (since the last sent presence at least) and is the same for
> all members in the user's roster. Is this "floating feature" (which
> can be switched on/off) really compatible with XEP-0115?

I'd say yes, the receiving client should re-disco or use a previously cached 
caps hash.

Jakob

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to