Hi, On Thursday August 9 2007, Sergei Golovan wrote: > 3) (Theoretical question) If we look at client capabilities XEP (115) > we may see that it reaches it's purpose if a features list isn't > changed (since the last sent presence at least) and is the same for > all members in the user's roster. Is this "floating feature" (which > can be switched on/off) really compatible with XEP-0115?
I'd say yes, the receiving client should re-disco or use a previously cached caps hash. Jakob
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.