On 8/10/07, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sergei Golovan wrote: > > > > This message looks like <iq/> but <iq/> is better because the > > recipient may receive result in case of accepted attention or error in > > case of ignored one. The ability of getting a response even makes > > disco#info queries unnecessary. > > Yes this seems like an acceptable use of IQ to me, though I don't know > if you really need a response to an attention request.
Yes, I'd like to know if my attention request wasn't ignored by a recipient's client. > > > > I'd not call a responding on disco#info and disco#items query per > > recipient an overkill. > > In this case it seems like overkill to me -- the client needs to keep You're right that in case of attention support it's an overkill. So, I'd remove several MUSTs from the XEP. Namely, I don't feel that disco#info querying is necessary before alerting and I don't think that the advertising must be switched off when it's disabled. (There are too many MUSTs in the XEP. I'd remove all of them, actually.) -- Sergei Golovan
