Jonathan Schleifer wrote: > Many argue that privacy lists are too complex for invisibility or > blocking users. For example, the Pidgin developers. They complained that > they need to implement privacy lists completely in order to achieve > invisibility and blocking. > > IMO, we could change the XEP to include some reserved names for priacy > lists like blocked or invisible, so that all clients can use them > together without any problems. Just setting & enabling a privacy thing > is easy, the problem is interferences with other clients. This would be > solved if we had some reserverd names for privacy lists.
And how would be be invisible AND block some users (to not receive SPIM)? -- Yann
