Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Justin Karneges wrote: >> On Monday 15 December 2008 07:46:16 Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >>> Therefore I suggest that we simplify e2e by using >>> something very close to the original XTLS proposal to set up, use, and >>> tear down and XTLS tunnel. I've outlined the protocol below. >> >> First, we should use IBB. Sure, it adds complexity with the block sizes and >> message vs iq, but you want this stuff. The only downside is the extra >> round >> trip on startup. > > And the concern that lots of server admins will block IBB because people > use it for file transfer, whereas (some) server admins might be less > likely to block a technology that enables user security.
Since you can use IBB over XTLS, an admin may ban XTLS, too. Dirk -- If you're not part of the solution, be part of the problem!
