On Mon Dec 15 19:26:04 2008, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 07:28:45PM +0000, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On the other hand, banning IBB if it *is* used for encrypted
channels -
> knowing that encrypted channels can bypass the server entirely -
has
> reasonable use-cases. (Similarly, blocking Jingle content-types
> selectively to prevent encryption is sane in some environments,
too).
And does the admin know that IBB is being used for an XTLS tunnel?
Based
on the XTLS exchange before IBB is invoked?
Sorry, I meant "even if it *is*".
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:d...@cridland.net - xmpp:d...@dave.cridland.net
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
