Le 27 févr. 09 à 15:34, Dave Cridland a écrit :

No, I disagree, the sm-id is allocated by the server, the server can put as much meaning into it as it wants. It's still opaque to the client.

If the server's implementation means that it needs to have access to the full jid, then it should encode that into the sm-id.

There is abolutely no need at all to make such encoding interoperable.

Except promoting good practice.

Reply via email to