On Thu Apr 9 14:57:44 2009, Sachin Khandelwal wrote:
Here my concern was how the client will come to know that the response is actually a zero rosteritem (empty roster) condition and not that "the roster changes will be sent later as interim roster pushes" as mentioned in sec 2.4.
I'm not sure there is a concrete problem here without more thought, but assuming there is, I think it can be avoided by including a count in the responses, which might well be useful for debugging purposes anyway.
I need to think more on this, though - which I'll do after Easter. Dave. -- Dave Cridland - mailto:d...@cridland.net - xmpp:d...@dave.cridland.net - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/ - http://dave.cridland.net/ Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade
