On 4/13/09 5:57 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Mon Apr 13 18:18:39 2009, Jiří Zárevúcký wrote: >> Am I right? > > Yes, you are, well spotted. > >> Any idea how to handle it fool-proof way without actually >> sending two interim pushes for contact1? > > Yes, you don't want to send two interim responses, since then servers > would actually have to remember what versions were. > > >> Or maybe just specify that the client must not store the new changes >> until everything is received. > > That's the simplest option, yes - we can just add that at the end of > section 2.4, where it describes how to check if everything has been > received yet.
That seems sensible. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
