2010/3/8 Remko Tronçon <re...@el-tramo.be>: >> The clean separation of RFC 3920 and RFC 3921 allows this. >> XEP-0279 breaks this and causes tight coupling of these layers. > > On the other hand, if your server implementation has a hard time > figuring it out, don't support it.
Yay, I'm not alone in thinking that each implementation need not support *every* published XEP :) I swear if some of the humourous XEPs weren't marked as such then we'd have implementations by now. > If all the stories are true, this > XEP is a use case that will only be used in limited scenarios anyway > (since all of our popular scenarios support more advanced features > that don't require this). Exactly. Matthew
