Re: [Standards] XEP-0184: vs. vs.

[Kozlov Konstantin]

> On 06/16/2010 08:43 PM, Kozlov Konstantin wrote:
> > The log, attached to the first message clearly says that even author of 
> > XEP-0184 do not agree with you, Kevin. So, why do you argue?
> Maybe we should just choose what we want of this XEP and just re-phrase 
> some sentences.
> I personaly think that knowing that message has not correctly been 
> received and processed (decrypted for example) is usefull so that we 
> know we should re-send it. Now knowing that it has been read is 
> something else.
Yes! For me is interesting both the fact the message is delivered to the other 
side and the fact that user on the other side read it. That's why I suggest to 
extend XEP-0184 with <read /> element.