Kevin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Kozlov Konstantin <yag...@yandex.ru> wrote:
On 06/16/2010 08:27 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
The log, attached to the first message clearly says that even author of XEP-0184 do not agree with you, Kevin. So, why do you argue?
Well, because the way that the XEP is written reads quite clearly (to
me) that the message has to have been presented to the user, and given
that presented means displayed.
Yes, but "displayed" doesn't mean that user "read" the message.
This suggests we need to sort out the wording to be unambiguous one
way or the other, and hopefully in such a way that Council agree with
the author on what it means the next time they vote :)
Yes. Let's sort out what means "received", "displayed" and "read" to
decide which of them are needed and which are not.
