On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Kevin Smith <ke...@kismith.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Mark Rejhon <marky...@gmail.com> wrote: > > From my reading of XEP-0308, only a <body> can be replaced with a <body>. > > If I replace the <body> with something else, the message might > technically > > be considered removed (because the <body> is removed from the stanza > being > > replaced) > > > > Can the authors of XEP-0308 clarify as to the intent of XEP-0308 in > > transmitting multiple replacement stanzas for the same message id, for > > different purposes? > > 308 already covers this - see the penultimate Business Rule. When > receiving a correction it is assumed to be a complete replacement for > the stanza - so sending a body and then correcting it to not include a > body wouldn't be appropriate (the client would 'lose' the initial > body). Ok, thanks -- that clarifies things. So, I was correct -- Lance's suggestion would be 'illegal' use of XEP-0308. (But it was a good try, though -- if his interpretation was correct!)
