If you guys want your proposal to become an official XEP, feel free to
send the XML to edi...@xmpp.org and I will add it to the inbox:

http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/

Peter

On 4/17/13 2:05 AM, Tim wrote:
> Hi everyone !
>
> I've generated the XHTML file from our XEP, you can read our XEP
> proposal with this link http://edhelas.mov.im/XEP/xep/movim_xep.html
>
> Have a good day,
>
> Tim
>
>
> 2013/3/29 Tim <edhe...@gmail.com <mailto:edhe...@gmail.com>>
>
>     If you have any questions on our proposition do not hesitate to
>     ask us :)
>
>     Tim
>
>     2013/3/28 Jaussoin Timothée <edhe...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:edhe...@gmail.com>>:
>     > Le 11/02/2013 12:25, Ashley Ward a écrit :
>     >
>     >> On 11/02/2013 10:24, "Sergey Dobrov" <bin...@jrudevels.org
>     <mailto:bin...@jrudevels.org>> wrote:
>     >>
>     >>> Don't you guys think that the fact that PEP has subscribers from a
>     >>> user's roster does such feature dangerous?
>     >>
>     >> Yes, I agree. You wouldn't want to make this the general case
>     as there are
>     >> serious privacy concerns with automatically sharing this
>     information
>     >> (roster items or general pubsub subscriptions).
>     >>
>     >> With pubsub subscriptions there is also the case that your home
>     server
>     >> doesn't actually know your subscriptions on a remote server.
>     This is
>     >> another one of the reasons that I think storing and sharing this
>     >> information should be application specific.
>     >>
>     >> PEP provides a good place to store this information, but I
>     think the data
>     >> should be stored in the pep nodes in an application specific
>     manner,
>     >> rather than trying to generalise it.
>     >>
>     >> The application itself is then responsible for obtaining user's
>     consent to
>     >> share this information, and deciding what information is stored and
>     >> disseminated.
>     >>
>     >> I don't think anything about this should be mandated in the
>     xmpp spec at
>     >> the moment. The tools are already there to handle this sort of
>     thing.
>     >>
>     >> There may be a case for adding discovery of other user's
>     subscriptions to
>     >> the xep-0060 spec, but you would have to also add methods of
>     controlling
>     >> access to that information too, and it's already complex enough!
>     >>
>     >> --
>     >> Ash
>     >>
>     >>
>     > Hi !
>     >
>     > We've made some modifications of the XEP here
>     > http://lite.framapad.org/p/zIMeGxQZfS .
>     > We also start an experimental implementation in Movim :)
>     >
>     > The most important new element of the XEP is the ID generation
>     (line 97).
>     >
>     > edhelas
>
>

Reply via email to