Simon Tennant: > IMHO, e2e security would probably make more sense as a XEP and working > group that has the time to zoom into all the implementation details.
Can that be solved by an XEP ? What about this IETF draft? (I still have to read it) End-to-End Object Encryption and Signatures for the Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol (XMPP) draft-miller-xmpp-e2e-06 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-miller-xmpp-e2e/ There exist people who mention XMPP as belonging to "faulty technologies" for which they want to create alternatives: http://youbroketheinternet.org/ And I try to find out what can be done to improve XMPP regarding security and privacy. Cheers, Andreas > On 18 November 2013 10:30, Andreas Kuckartz <a.kucka...@ping.de > <mailto:a.kucka...@ping.de>> wrote: > > Peter Saint-Andre some time ago wrote: > > On 7/16/13 4:27 AM, Carlo v. Loesch wrote: > >> Since XMPP isn't suitable for keeping meta-data private I would > >> presume that e2e privacy is out of scope for this mailing list, > >> really. > > > > True. > > Where would the topic e2e privacy for XMPP be "in scope" ? > > Cheers, > Andreas
