On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Carlo v. Loesch <c...@mail.symlynx.com>wrote:
> If you don't accept social graph protection as a more important > priority than interoperability, "Interoperability" is a posh word for "works". Dave.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 1:01 PM, Carlo v. Loesch <c...@mail.symlynx.com>wrote:
> If you don't accept social graph protection as a more important > priority than interoperability, "Interoperability" is a posh word for "works". Dave.