> I have some questions regarding the business rules: > > - Why enforce a single id at a time ? I think it can be useful to have > multiple ids in a message: > > <message ...> > [...] > <stanza-id by="r...@muc.example.org" id="aaa"/> > <stanza-id by="arch...@myserver.com" id="bbb"/> > </message> >
This is allowed. The restriction here is that you can only have one <stanza-id /> with a given JID in the 'by' attribute. So the above is ok, but this is NOT ok: <message ...> [...] <stanza-id by="r...@muc.example.org" id="aaa"/> <stanza-id by="r...@muc.example.org" id="bbb"/> </message> > - Why put the client-id in the stanza-id ? It has been suggested (but not yet incorporated into 359) that client-id be replaced by the simple lack of a 'by' attribute. (If no 'by' is present, the entity that stamped the ID is the stanza sender, pending the support checks that should be added in the security considerations that I mentioned on list earlier.) - Lance
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
