> On 12 Jul 2016, at 13:49, Ralph Meijer <ral...@ik.nu> wrote: > > On 2016-07-12 05:11, Sam Whited wrote: >> I've tried to address some of this feedback here: >> >> https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/206 >> >> I think the only thing I left out was getting rid of the IM compliance >> suites (in case any of the IoT crowd chime in). >> >> I also added MIX as a possible provider of "Group Chat" and merged the >> web compliance suites into a single item, making BOSH and Websockets >> interchangeable. More suggestions for web-friendly features would be >> appreciated from web client authors (maybe they're similar to mobile >> concerns?). >> >> Let me know what you think. It could probably use a bit of description >> about what the providers column means now; I envision a comma as being >> an OR as in "MUC or MIX". > > Although I strongly believe in the prospects of what MIX will bring to > the table, to me, it doesn't make sense to put in any reference to MIX > at this point in time. The point of this suite is to get > interoperability between a wide array of client and server > implementations so that things Just Work™. MIX is nowhere near mature > enough that this is achievable within 2016.
I think that’s right. I think a note about MIX might be well-placed, but not as part of the compliance tables. /K _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
