On 12 July 2016 at 17:31, Sam Whited <s...@samwhited.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > > Sure, we do. But nobody can implement MIX right now, so it's a waste of > time > > trying to put it into a Compliance Suite as anything more than a mention > > that we're expecting it to be in the next revision, perhaps. > > It's already in there, so I don't see it as a waste of time, that's a > sunk cost :) > > I didn't mean *your* time... :-)
> If someone came out with a server that only supported MIX (and not > MUC) tomorrow, I would see no reason not to call them compliant since > they support group chat (which is the "feature" that MIX/MUC are > listed under), so I see no reason why we shouldn't include it unless > we're suggesting that you really do *have* to have MUC specifically > and not just "group chat"? > > I'm suggesting we have to have MUC specifically. If a server can implement any specification they like for any of these features, then Skype qualifies. > —Sam > > > > -- > Sam Whited > pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 > https://blog.samwhited.com > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ >
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
