On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote: > Not *all* Final XEPs are going to be in Core in a Compliance Suite, simply > because we might not have a compliance suite covering, say, IoT yet. And > maybe there'll be exceptions to the XEP states (XEP-0054 is Historical, yet > I'd argue it's Core), but we should be examining mismatches.
I'd argue there are two other types of XEPs: Those that are widely used that we should discourage further use of (eg. XEP-0153 is one of these and therefore should not be in the compliance suites in my mind). > - MIX doesn't (yet) belong here. And those that are experimental and don't have many features, but that we want to strongly encourage people develop and start working on like MIX. These should be in the compliance suites (but only if there are other alternatives available, such as 0045 in this example) in my opinion. —Sam -- Sam Whited pub 4096R/54083AE104EA7AD3 https://blog.samwhited.com _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
